tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6583590687956540859.post7960224135902951768..comments2024-01-18T00:18:10.209-08:00Comments on Xenophilia (True Strange Stuff): Penrose claims to have glimpsed universe before Big BangXenohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04080841307174630996noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6583590687956540859.post-29872209652479609052010-11-26T00:44:45.000-08:002010-11-26T00:44:45.000-08:00If the fine-structure constant spatially varies, t...If the fine-structure constant spatially varies, then there can't be a universal truth constant, because all constants will vary in strength the most along this dipole axis that roughly aligns with the dark flow. Gravity, light speed, EM forces, all vary throughout the universe at greater distances, according to telescopic measurements by the John Webb team.jim hensonhttp://quantauniverse.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6583590687956540859.post-13180410036204852062010-11-25T03:56:51.000-08:002010-11-25T03:56:51.000-08:00Hold on! How can one say, "Hawking is very cl...Hold on! How can one say, "Hawking is very close to Truth," without defining what "truth" is. But, of course, "he is not perfect in his views," who is? <br><br>What if I define truth to what Hawking says, instead of someone else? <br><br>But, of course, I wouldn't do that, because I wouldn't let any one person manipulate my thinking. It would have to be from a whole body of investigations, not one, however noteworthy, person. (Please, to rely on one person for anything so important as to manipulate your faith or belief, it's far too close, for example, to what people in Mussolini's Italy did; or the general U.S. population did concerning Pres. Bush's assertions after 9-11, when he really could prove nothing. Now, we're stuck in an era of "endless wars.") After all, even Einstein's notions had to be verified with further investigations before they were more or less accepted. Yet, even today Einstein's work is still debated and checked. Anyway, who is to say that "truth" is a constant universal? Maybe it isn't.Annnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6583590687956540859.post-37626147302806682182010-11-24T23:51:56.000-08:002010-11-24T23:51:56.000-08:00Radhasoami Faith View of Modus Operandi of Creatio...Radhasoami Faith View of Modus Operandi of Creation of Universe<br><br><br>Yes,Universe existed before Big Bang please. <br><br>Stephen Hawking writes in The Grand Design, “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.” Hawking said the Big Bang was merely the consequence of the law of gravity. In A Brief History of Time, Hawking had suggested that the idea of God or a divine being was not necessarily incompatible with a scientific understanding of the Universe. <br><br>Although Hawking is very close to Truth yet he is not perfect in his views while discarding the role of divine being. I consider the role of eternal gravity uppermost but I strongly differ with Hawking on the role of divine being. I consider Divine Ordainment is the cause of Creation of Universe. <br><br>Now I give Radhasoami Faith view of Creation Theory. In Sar Bachan (Poetry) composed by His Holiness Soamiji Maharaj the August Founder of Radhasoami Faith the details of creation and dissolution has been described very scientifically. It is written in Jeth Mahina (name of Hindi moth) in this Holy Book: Only He Himself (Supreme Father)and none else was there. There issued forth a great current of spirituality, love and grace (In scientific terminology we may call this current as gravitational wave). This is called His Mauj (Divine Ordainment). This was the first manifestation of Supreme Being. This Divine Ordainment brought into being three regions, viz., Agam, Alakh, and Satnam of eternal bliss. Then a current emerged with a powerful sound (this was the first Big Bang). It brought forth the creation of seven Surats or currents of various shades and colours (in scientific terminology we may call it electromagnetic waves). Here the true Jaman or coagulant was given (in scientific terminology this coagulant may be called as weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force). Surats, among themselves, brought the creation into being.<br><br>These currents descended down further and brought the whole universe/multi verse into being i.e. black holes, galaxies etc. were born.<br>I would like to add further that sound energy and gravitational force current are non polar entity and electromagnetic force is bi-polar. Hence spiritual polarization, if occurred, is occurred in the region of Sat Lok and region below to it only.Anirudh Kumar Satsanginoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6583590687956540859.post-25121861839778906172010-11-22T11:54:31.000-08:002010-11-22T11:54:31.000-08:00didn't Penrose get just a little bit told off ...didn't Penrose get just a little bit told off for some of his theories.<br><br>His data isn't too bad, his application is a bit off the mark.oliver stiebernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6583590687956540859.post-91330508304742832032010-11-23T17:58:59.000-08:002010-11-23T17:58:59.000-08:00Lerner says the CMB aligns with our local superclu...Lerner says the CMB aligns with our local supercluster group, which our galaxy is a part of. The Lorentz force might be responsible for the concentric circles in the CMB, and represent the past, possibly a white hole. This wrecks havoc on the big-bang theory, and supports an EM Plasma Universejim hensonhttp://quantauniverse.comnoreply@blogger.com