I was wrongly diagnosed as delusional by the psychiatric staff of Ward 7 at Northland Base Hospital in Whangarei and held ... against my will for 11 days in mid-2006, because I maintained the attacks of 9/11 were orchestrated by criminal elements inside the US Administration.
A definition of delusional: relating to, based on, or affected by delusions. A delusion: a false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence, especially as a symptom of mental illness.
In light of the definition, one of the most astounding aspects to the ordeal was that when I met with the chief psychiatrist, Dr Carlos Zubaran for two formal mental health assessments, I held Issue 3 of Uncensored, which is shown in the picture above, and asked him to look at information related to the 9/11 attacks. This magazine contained an article I’d written entitled: Why Does TVNZ Lie To Us About 9/11?, which cited evidence that proved the official fable was a lie – yet reminiscent of the fabled vampires afraid of the light of day, he refused to even cast his eyes over it, during both of the so-called “assessments.”
Another astounding aspect to what occurred was that Section 4 of the New Zealand Mental Health Act makes it clear that no one can be judged to be mentally ill solely on the basis of their political beliefs. The District Inspector for Mental Health – Northland, barrister Julie Young; Bridget Westenra, the lawyer she appointed to assist me and the staff of Ward 7, including the chief psychiatrist, did not appear to know this. As can be seen, it is written in layman’s language on page 33 of Chapter 2 of Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992, which is on the Ministry of Health’s own website: ‘You cannot be considered to have a mental disorder just because of your: political, religious or cultural beliefs…’.
As this Judgement shows, because of his reluctance to scrutinize the evidence related to 9/11 and apparent lack of awareness of Section 4 of the Act, nine days into my incarceration, Dr Zubaran still held the belief I suffered from a “delusional disorder” because of my political beliefs.
The evidence that shows the official story of 9/11 was indeed a lie is now overwhelming. We now have what has been referred to as the “loaded gun” – this is the unignited nanothermite, a highly-advanced explosive substance, which was far too sophisticated a composite to have originated from a cave in Afghanistan. Think military. Think US government.
The following article, which relates to what occurred in Ward 7, was published in Issue 8 of Uncensored. Thankfully, since writing about what happened and making numerous phone calls, plus sending many letters, as well as supplying numerous DVDs to the staff of Ward 7 to show them the truth about 9/11 – and then finally threatening to protest outside the hospital, the Clinical Director of Mental Health & Addiction Services in Northland sent an apology in August 2008, which can be viewed here. ...
By Clare Swinney, Member of Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice.
http://clareswinney.wordpress.com
This on the nano-thermite angle:
Here is a reply to an obvious question:
BennyDACHO said, "how do we know the dust he got wasn't tempered with, and how do we even know if it's the right dust?"
4 different samples
4 different locations
collected by 4 different citizens of New York
Dust samples were sent to multiple scientists
All samples gave explosive results.
Owners of the dust have given video recorded testimonies of who are they, how they collected the dust and when. If you are still in doubt, call the FBI, shut-up, or test the dust for yourself!
Video with a claim of "willful ignorance" by a NIST investigator.
7 comments:
Psychiatry has always been an instrument of social control, a convenient way of 'putting away' those whose views clash with prevailing group (family, national, general society) views of events or conditions. The psychiatric 'diagnoses' are the justification to take people out of circulation who have not committed any crime that could land them in prison. Kind of barbarian, isn't is?
I think that it is wrong to say that one is delusional for thinking something that, at first glance, does seem like it could be true. But I do not agree that 9/11 was an inside job. All of the theories I've heard can be easily debunked. And all of the videos I've seen trying to attack any debunks are unremarkable, and do nothing to prove the "truth" position. If any other commenters have a link to an article or video that can actually debunk one or some of the debunks that have been presented contrary to the "truth" movement, please provide a link, I would very much appreciate it. But still, to call someone delusional for believing something is going to far.
Physical evidence can be ignored, misinterpreted, or destroyed, but it can not be debunked. I, for example, do not see a jet sized hole in that composite of photos taken right after the something hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Which pill did I take?
3:32 Ahh, that post. I believe I commented on that as well. Why don't you take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is_qBXqObes (I'm not familiar with the XHTML formatting.) It explains that quite well.
Patriotically speculative, I suppose. Try this. Go to 5:09. Footage of an object hitting the Pentagon which seems to move like a UFO, it slows down and speeds up into a blur twice if you go frame by frame. And it looks like a small white missile, not a big silver jet. When it first happened, no jet debris was reported by a reporter on the scene.
We have conflicting views, it is how it is. We are what we are. I do not want to get into an argument with you out of respect for you. This is the place where I go for news, and everything in it is intriguing to me. Just because of one disagreement, I'm not going to stop coming. So, we'll just leave it where it is. So, thank you for great content every day. I shall hope to talk again in future articles.
Yeah, I guess it really depends on what you were raised on. But I like to know the facts before I decide. Nice talking with you.
Post a Comment