Thursday, June 24, 2010

Can Petraeus deliver in Afghanistan?

General PetraeusDavid Petraeus, one of America's most senior and best-known generals, is preparing to take over in Afghanistan. What effect will switching the top job have on the current counter-insurgency strategy?

The nomination of General David Petraeus to take over as commander of Nato's international security assistance Force (ISAF) in place of the sacked General Stanley McChrystal, was the only sensible option available to President Barack Obama.

As commanding general of the multinational force in Iraq from 2007 to 2008, he is widely credited with having led the successful military surge that allowed real progress in stabilising the country, and a phased withdrawal of foreign troops.

As commander of US Central Command (CentCom), he has been in the chain of command between Gen McChrystal and the White House for US national operations in Afghanistan, which are distinct from Nato operations and are directed more specifically at ousting terrorism through the use of special forces and other discreet capabilities.

International standing

He has the international stature and profile to allow Mr Obama to repair a situation that is quite dreadful in its timing. Afghan and allied forces are on the brink of an operation to tackle the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar, the second city of Afghanistan. This is seen globally as the next stage of the campaign that began with Operation Moshtarak in Helmand, and which could be defining in confirming progress towards the handover of security to Afghan forces and eventual withdrawal of foreign troops.

For Gen Petraeus, 57, this is a demotion of post if not of rank. As head of CentCom, he is in charge of all US military operations from Afghanistan through the Gulf and Saudi Arabia to Somalia and Egypt in the West.

Gen Petraeus is a masterful political general. He is highly articulate and adept at judging and communicating with an international audience. In this respect, he is very different from Gen McChrystal who majors on the rough, tough and blunt as the Rolling Stone article captures.

With his own experience of Iraq and his association with Afghanistan, he is likely to run with the McChrystal plan as Mr Obama intends. It will be important, however, for the plan to develop to cope with outcomes that are unlikely to conform to expectations. Gen Petraeus is known to be uncomfortable with the July 2011 deadline that President Obama presented as the beginning of withdrawal. ...

via BBC News - Can Petraeus deliver in Afghanistan?.

1 comment:

Obama wimp? said...

Don't call Obama a wimp!

If you liked Bush's hawkish attitude, you're going to love what Obama has planned.

After becoming president Obama accelerated all military plans.

The people in the US may be in bad economic times, but the US military is way ahead of schedule, spending US taxpayers' money like crazy.

And it's aiming specifically at Iran.

War against Iran is imminent.

Britain booted the people off their African island of Diego Garcia.

Why?

So the US could build yet another massive military base on it.

Why?

It's striking distance to points in the Middle East and Central Asia.

The US Navy sent nuclear-powered submarines to the island. Each sub is Tomahawk-missile-equipped and can carry nuclear warheads.

Each sub have the striking power of a typical carrier battle group.

The Sunday Herald (Glasgow) said that Obama dispatched includes 387 “bunker busters” used for blasting underground structures

According to Dan Plesch, at the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy in London. “US bombers and long range missiles are ready today to destroy 10,000 targets in Iran in a few hours,” he said.

“The firepower of US forces has quadrupled since 2003,” accelerating under Obama.

So, it'll happen sooner than expected.

After all, Obama's popularity has been dropping in the polls. He's got to do something to keep his rating high.

Like a doctor giving an injection.

A dose of democracy, love and peace to the world.

Peace!