Fort Worth area resident Lisa Brock-Piekarski is a little freaked out by images she discovered on an infrared camera mounted at her family's favorite hunting spot.
That's not because of the deer in the foreground but because of the mysterious lights in the background to the left of the animal.
"What I see looks almost like a Frisbee," Brock-Piekarski told Dallas-Fort Worth NBC affiliate KXAS-TV. "You see a several lights going around, and they're all symmetrical and lit up, and it just looks like an object in the sky."
While she hesitated calling it a UFO, Brock-Piekarski could not identify what might have caused the string of lights to appear in the photos, taken over a timespan of almost two hours.
"There's nothing back there but trees and sky," she said. "There's no hills, no buildings, nothing back there. It's all flat."
Brock-Piekarski said the pictures were taken by an infrared, motion-activated game camera. The equipment wasn't moved, and it doesn't have a flash.
"We've seen falling stars, all kinds of stuff out there because you're away from the city," she said. "Anytime there's a meteor shower or anything, you can see it a lot better, but I've never seen anything like that."
The Brock-Piekarski's hunting land is located in Archer City, which is near Sheppard Air Force Base. The installation did not immediately return requests from KXAS-TV asking if it had planes up the night the images were taken.
Brock-Piekarski added that she was now a little hesitant to go out hunting and to her deer blind alone.
"It's a little creepy," Brock-Piekarski said. "I don't know if I want to be sitting out in my deer stand by myself anymore, hunting."
via Did hunter's infrared camera capture images of UFO? | Outposts | Los Angeles Times.
Fort Worth, Tex. -- A motion-activated camera at a Fort Worth family's favorite hunting spot is capturing shots of mysterious objects.
Lisa Brock-Piekarski's game camera is supposed to take pictures of the deer on her Archer City hunting lease, but the pictures show something she can't explain.
via Droidzilla
Thanks to Ann for point this out.
Why are there two photos of the same frozen deer and object with the sky showing what seems to be two different times of day? (last photo below).
The camera did not move, but the object definitely did. Compare the 6:06 AM and 6:07 AM images. In the 6:07 AM image, there is a lighter duplicate blurred double of the image. It seems to have been caught in this frame zooming away. Or is that a cloud. Even freakier thought: Perhaps it is still there in the daylight photo, but "cloaked" by some kind of projector or reflection technology.
The times mentions that this was near Sheppard Air Force Base, but when I did a search on Google I found that the Kickapoo Space Surveillance Station is also in Archer City, Texas.
"One of the lesser-known assets of the US Space Command's world-wide space surveillance system is the 217 MHz NAVSPASUR "fence" across the southern US." - fas
UFO caught on deer camera, Archer City TX
Vicinity of Kickapoo Space Surveillance Station Archer City, Texas
5 comments:
Here's another question to ask:
Why are there no photos of the object by itself? All the images of it seem to also show a deer. If the object shows up that prominently on the pictures, then I'm sure it could have triggered it by itself, so why does it only show up when something else appears to have triggered the camera? Someone could have embedded the image in with the only pictures they had from it: when there was movement.
Then again, perhaps because the object seems to have stayed almost perfectly still for the whole time it was there (the change in position and intensity so gradual), the camera accepted it as part of the background, therefore it was not able to trigger the camera.
But then, when it was leaving (if it did) or arriving, it also should have triggered he camera with its motion.
Pretty fishy, I'm not sure what to make of it.
A motion sensor, like those that open supermarket doors, is used for game camera traps and a deer would trigger it but not something more that 25 feet or so away, no matter how loud or bright it was.
Ok, then, whether sound activated or motion activated, the camera wouldn't photograph a presumably quiet UFO, that appears to be more than 25 feet or so away. And, that is the reason there are no photos of the object by itself.
Right. A large slow moving jet, I assume a huge military transport, just flew very low over my apartment, lower than I've ever heard before. I actually thought a jet was crashing from the sound. The stealth technology they use is a trip. You only hear it when it is right on top of you. By the time I got outside, it looked like a triangle of lights... but I think that's just the configuration of from my vantage point. Good reminder to have binoculars handy.
I'm sure the investigative reporting pointed out by Ann is right, but I wish they would have explained where the other four rows of lights are in the picture. Maybe I'm not understanding the configuration; perhaps only one row is at ninety degrees to the reflective surface.
Post a Comment