Friday, February 11, 2011

Experts determine age of book 'nobody can read'

While enthusiasts across the world pored over the Voynich manuscript, one of the most mysterious writings ever found – penned by an unknown author in a language no one understands – a research team at the UA solved one of its biggest mysteries: When was the book made?

University of Arizona researchers have cracked one of the puzzles surrounding what has been called "the world's most mysterious manuscript" – the Voynich manuscript, a book filled with drawings and writings nobody has been able to make sense of to this day.

Using radiocarbon dating, a team led by Greg Hodgins in the UA's department of physics has found the manuscript's parchment pages date back to the early 15th century, making the book a century older than scholars had previously thought.

This tome makes the "DaVinci Code" look downright lackluster: Rows of text scrawled on visibly aged parchment, flowing around intricately drawn illustrations depicting plants, astronomical charts and human figures bathing in – perhaps – the fountain of youth. At first glance, the "Voynich manuscript" appears to be not unlike any other antique work of writing and drawing.

An alien language

But a second, closer look reveals that nothing here is what it seems. Alien characters, some resembling Latin letters, others unlike anything used in any known language, are arranged into what appear to be words and sentences, except they don't resemble anything written – or read – by human beings.

Hodgins, an assistant research scientist and assistant professor in the UA's department of physics with a joint appointment at the UA's School of Anthropology, is fascinated with the manuscript.

"Is it a code, a cipher of some kind? People are doing statistical analysis of letter use and word use – the tools that have been used for code breaking. But they still haven't figured it out."

A chemist and archaeological scientist by training, Hodgins works for the NSF Arizona Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, or AMS, Laboratory, which is shared between physics and geosciences. His team was able to nail down the time when the Voynich manuscript was made.

Currently owned by the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library of Yale University, the manuscript was discovered in the Villa Mondragone near Rome in 1912 by antique book dealer Wilfrid Voynich while sifting through a chest of books offered for sale by the Society of Jesus. Voynich dedicated the remainder of his life to unveiling the mystery of the book's origin and deciphering its meanings. He died 18 years later, without having wrestled any its secrets from the book. ...

To obtain the sample from the manuscript, Hodgins traveled to Yale University, where conservators had previously identified pages that had not been rebound or repaired and were the best to sample.

"I sat down with the Voynich manuscript on a desk in front of me, and delicately dissected a piece of parchment from the edge of a page with a scalpel," Hodgins says.

He cut four samples from four pages, each measuring about 1 by 6 millimeters (ca. 1/16 by 1 inch) and brought them back to the laboratory in Tucson, where they were thoroughly cleaned.

"Because we were sampling from the page margins, we expected there are a lot of finger oils adsorbed over time," Hodgins explains. "Plus, if the book was re-bound at any point, the sampling spots on these pages may actually not have been on the edge but on the spine, meaning they may have had adhesives on them."

"The modern methods we use to date the material are so sensitive that traces of modern contamination would be enough to throw things off."

Next, the sample was combusted, stripping the material of any unwanted compounds and leaving behind only its carbon content as a small dusting of graphite at the bottom of the vial.

"In radiocarbon dating, there is this whole system of many people working at it," he said. "It takes many skills to produce a date. From start to finish, there is archaeological expertise; there is biochemical and chemical expertise; we need physicists, engineers and statisticians. It's one of the joys of working in this place that we all work together toward this common goal."

The UA's team was able to push back the presumed age of the Voynich manuscript by 100 years, a discovery that killed some of the previously held hypotheses about its origins and history. ...

via Experts determine age of book 'nobody can read'.

I believe above article (February 10, 2011 By Daniel Stolte ) is about the same work I posted about  in 2009 where it was dated to between 1404 and 1438 with "95% confidence".
The likely date range is 1404 to 1438 at 95% confidence, and apparently have found evidence that the ink was added in the same period. As Nick says, "that pretty much rules out Roger Bacon, Francis Bacon, the Knights Templar, the Rosicrucians, Leonardo da Vinci, and indeed more or less everything pre-1400 or post-Columbus." That is, pretty much every theory ever offered on the origin of the mysterious manuscript! - tdg

Researchers at the University of Arizona used the radiocarbon dating method on the 246 pages written in Europe by and found that the parchment was made between 1404 and 1438 - earthtimes.org

See the document for yourself here: http://voynichcentral.com/gallery/. To repeat my previous comment, as Al Harrison points out in his book After Contact,  even if we do one day encounter signals from intelligent aliens, even when SETI succeeds, without some kind of Rosetta Stone, we might not understand a single word for over 100 years. The Voynich Manuscript seems to be an example that we can not decode things without a common point of reference.  The idea from Star Trek of a Universal Translator is more absurd than it at first seems.

23 comments:

Mirlen101 said...

Here's my take on it from looking at some of the images. You have maps describing the England area ( castles ) you have the Arab world ? ( onion top buildings )There are references to water and stars . The stars don't seem to have map references though . Water seems more defined by area ( mapped ) Scaled areas are walls ? Some references seem to be bridges . There might be references to the number of people and armed forces also . So basically it seems to be a war map . Giving all information needed to make strategic calculations for war . Probably in code because it is top secret for obvious reasons . Which would mean only a chosen few knew the code or how to read it . But it seems to be from somebody other than Arab or English . Because they seem to be the intended targets .

Mirlen101 said...

I think this could be figured out by using estimated date . Architectural typing ( by date )Alphabetical typing by date , style and area , possibly Arab type culture ? Code breaking methods . One you determine location by proximity ( the army has to be between England and Arab nations ? ) You can't fight anyone that is too far , you run out of supplies ! Use alphabets of those places and times . Find similarity in alphabets . Then use those alphabets to break the code .There is probably some literature on codes from that area and time period ? I don't think this was a lunatic mind . It was highly calculated planning !

Mirlen101 said...

Oh ya there seems to be a compass mapping method involved . Gives suns location something to do with nightfall and an actual compass, possibly something like a sundial .

Mirlen101 said...

I think the areas of circles that point downward are close ups and instruction for weak point areas of attack . The stars represent night attacks . Blue dots on fortresses means weak spots to target also . Areas like doors tops of towers etc . Gives instructions for divisions to merge on weak points . It's also possible the areas are just representative . War planning for generic fortresses instead of actual places . But in that case why would it be in code ?

Mirlen101 said...

Seems to give wind directions , water flow directions . Words seem to correspond to Battalions . Types of defences and strategies . Word ( descriptions placed next to what they are describing ) example word "tower" placed next to image of tower ( logically ) It is all logically mapped and strategized .

Mirlen101 said...

The jars seem to be in code also . Color coded by type and shaped by type . Patterned by type also . To read them you look at color and placement of colors . Then patterns ( like stripes )then shapes . All are repeated over and over in slightly different forms ( not by chance )

Mirlen101 said...

Jars seem to refer to medicinal concoctions for administering to the wounded or ill ( military )Gives instructions for identification of herbs . Describes roots and tops of plants for extraction . Later put into coded jars . The jars also have some numerical code involved .Also some references to the actual illness involved .

Mirlen101 said...

There are sundial , night mapping of some sort . It seems to describe location using a sundial . Logical number systems like a clock . Goes into time and direct based on the sun . I don't see an actual star map though ! Not yet at least ;-)But it seems to be able to use the night sky to travel . So there must be a frame of reference ( star map )

Mirlen101 said...

Strange > I recognize some of the drawings as early English ? around the estimated date of the book . Mostly freehand drawn but some places done precisely with a compass and a square . At lest one area uses what looks like a noticeable number system on a dial . Something like 6,8,0( 10 )12,14 . With between lines meaning 7,9,11,13 . Obviously this is all a training and strategy book of war ! Gives just about all you need to know about doing war . How to travel day or night . How to find weak spots in fortresses . How to care for your soldiers medicinally !

Mirlen101 said...

Also gives descriptions of animals along the way , and what the animals eat ! Also peoples and their level in society ( queen or peasant ) what the weapons of choice are .What their religion is .
Their medicinal system seems to have derived from the appearance of roots . If a root looks like something then that root must have relative medicinal uses . Like if it looks like a head then it is for the head , headaches ? Primitive in some ways , advanced for the time in others .

Mirlen101 said...

There actually seems to be a numerical code breaker in the text margins on one part . It clearly states regular numerals 1234 and so on . With what appears to be corresponding code ! It can be found in " Marginal Writing " page 11 . Hard to believe no one has broken this wide open !Seems all the info needed is there !

Mirlen101 said...

abiril =April , May duh = May , YUNY THE PHYSICIAN ( Egyptian ) It's describing the Zodiac and the months etc....

Mirlen101 said...

Here's the month ,zodiac run down in association with the manuscript http://inamidst.com/voynich/months

Mirlen101 said...

Who ever wrote this was versed in at least two languages ( English ? and Egyptian ? ) And it was done by two or more people at least .

Xeno said...

Neat, thanks!

Setsuka said...

I've often wondered, when thinking about the Voynich Manuscript, "What if the pictures have nothing to do with the text?" I mean, what if they're just distractions for code breakers?

I think that either the author(s) was/were either polylingual or just made up their own language. Just throwing it out there, but what if it's a syllabary (every letter is a syllable), as opposed to an alphabet? Or even an abjad (consonant-based)?

Also, just a fun side note, one of the letters that I've seen looks a lot like an IPA glottal stop to me. :P

Mirlen101 said...

Didn't you read what I wrote ? The words are describing things like fortifications ,meds etc . You don't need to be able to actually read the manuscript to know what it is saying . The words are repeated next to specific items . Like "tower" is placed by a "tower" over and over . You don't need to read the code word for "tower" because you can determine it by location and frequency ( educated guessing ;-)It is in code because it is a war planning document ! Seems pretty simple to me ;-) I'd crack the code but I'm kind a busy ! ;-)

Setsuka said...

It's (very) likely that the pictures coincide, but I'm just saying that it's a possibility that the pictures aren't descriptions of the words. Something else that comes to mind is that the pictures and words correlate in some other fashion... <- uneducated guessing

This, by the way, coming from somebody with no experience with code breaking. Just some amateur linguist here. ;)

Remember... you could be dealing with not just another vocabulary, but another grammar. Good luck. :-)

Mirlen101 said...

Here's what I suspect and how to go about breaking the code ( in part ) Track drawing style to age and map ( we have a good idea of age already and area by the architecture shown ) I think I already recognize the style . It looks like English from the right time period . The architecture is obviously of English type ( castles ) and Muslim ( onion top buildings ) Who ever did this had to have inside knowledge of those structures . Because they showed inner details of the fortifications .
I would match words to objects . Matching the words that seem to be " Tower" with known words for "tower" from those areas near the depicted regions . I would start with old English and Arabic . I suspect it uses both languages based on the character ( style ) and origin of the info in the document . It even has areas that are not in code ( as I stated previously ) it refers to numbers and months of the zodiac ( read directly not in code ) It even has a couple sections that seem to show number code breaking directions . I would take the medicinal sections and match the words for the medicinal plants listed . The medicinal plant section I think is the key . It lists them in a particular way . Plants are listed according to root shape ( English method ). A plant with a root in the form of a man would be referred to as something like " Mandrake " again that points back to English origins of the time period ! The person seemed to be English with Arab influences . Or Arabs and the English working together .
This should be easily cracked by the right people . But it really doesn't need to be cracked to understand it . What's to understand ? We know the general area the time and reason ( mostly ) It would be nice to know more . If I had a clone I would have him work on it more ;-)

Mirlen101 said...

I was looking at the manuscript in the areas without images and you might have something there after all ( sort of ;-) The words have a pattern unlike what you would expect from normal patterns of written words . The words and letters are repeated in a way that seems to form a pattern of shapes . Hard to believe that even a coded text could be formed in this fashion . It's like there is a series of geometric lines running through the text . Only visible by drawing lines through letters that are the same . Like drawing lines from one "a" letter to the next . The letters keep lining up at long angled lines ! Way too often to be by coincidence . Be interesting to take color coded lines and keep drawing across each letter that is the same . It looks like a dot to dot puzzle ;-) That doesn't rule out coded language though . Some codes do use an alignment method . Where by words are made unintelligible by means of displacement ( change the alignment and position ) fracturing the words in a pattern .But normally this would look very random . This manuscript looks too patterned to be that type of code . It looks more like a binary code ! Very clever !

Mirlen101 said...

I think I figured out partly how the code? works .It is in numbers not letters . What looks like letters is numbers . What looks like a 9 or small g is a 6 ! most are what they seem but with some modifications . 8 looks just like it should . 4 looks like an "H" or a 4 or 4o , must be some meaning to the variances . 0 seems to be both 0 or 10 . Can't find 9 ! what looks like 9 I think is actually a 6 ! for some reason . Seems like 2 and 4's can mean 2=12 or 4=14 depending on proximity to other letters which aren't really letters they are other numerals modifiers ;-/ It all looks like a bunch of weird simple math problems linked together going left to right ?, up and down ? Probably some form of numerical code in a graph pattern , square structure ? A string of numbers linked by simple addition , subtraction and multiplication . So when you find out all the numbers and the proper addition , subtraction and multiplication somehow that translates into words ? How ever it works it seems to be at least three layers of figures ( code ? )

Mirlen101 said...

Ok from what I can figure out these number symbols can change in more ways 1 can be "10" or "0" so "0" can be "1" ;-/ 9 apparently looks like a 3 ! ;-/ 4 can look like a 4 or a small "c" ! 5 looks like a crescent . It's gets pretty confusing but I guess that was the point wasn't it ;-) Basically you have numbers some recognizable some not so much ;-) Then you have modifiers next to them which changes their value . Which form what looks like words . But you have to break it down on three levels or more ! It seems to show part of the code break down in the margins in some places but I think only what the number's corresponding symbols are ;-/ Only one part of the three or more layers ;-/

Mirlen101 said...

I think I got a bit wrong before ;-)Not a war book ! I now think it is not really technically a coded text either. It is Jewish mysticism .The Zodiac , medicinals , circles of protection . The text is a combination of cursive Jewish script which uses numerology . The zodiac also uses numerology , it is quite complex and mixed up styles and info . What looks like words is a meld between numbers and letters . Mostly seems to be coordinates . It's all a Jewish mystics instruction ,incantations ! Someone who understands old cursive Jewish script and it's numerology and association with the zodiac should be able to understand some of it .